5-23+Meeting+Minutes

=Architecture/Implementation Requirements WG Meeting Minutes=


 * Date:** 05/23/2011
 * Time:** 2:00 PM-3:00 PM EDT
 * Dial in:**1-408-600-3600 **Passcode:** 669 395 952
 * Meeting Agenda**:

Attendance
Rob Allen, Rita Altamore,Tom Boal, Kathryn Calderone, Steven Cason, Robert Dieterle, Joan Duhaime, Ernest Grove, Hal Jiang, Lester Keepper Jr, Cynthia Levy, Nam Nguyen, Andriy Selivonenko, Dave Shevlin, Jonathan Tadese, Jeff Tunkel, Merideth Vida, Bob Yencha

Action Items

 * # || Date Initiated || Action || Owner || Status || Date Closed ||
 * 1 || 05/23/2011 || Review and comment on LRI Policy and Service Identification || All || Open ||  ||
 * 2 || 05/23/2011 || Prepare to discuss policies for Validating Regulatory Conformance || All || Open ||  ||

Agenda Items
1. Poll June 14 &15th F2F attendance. Who will be attending and participating with the Architecture & Implementation Group? (As opposed to the other groups in which you participate?) 2. Consensus votes - Subject to review when the following workgroups complete their products: 3. Consensus vote on Deployment Models 4. Consensus vote on Abstract Model
 * IG Analysis
 * CIM/Vocabulary

Meeting Notes
A question was asked regarding how many people on the call were planning on attending the Face-to-Face meeting in June. It was determined that neither of the Leads from LRI Architecture/IR WG will be able to attend in person, but there will be representatives from a few organizations present.

Consensus votes were posted on the two products from last week. On the list of deployment models, some individuals thought that they were out of scope and never voted, so the deployment page was marked up in order to decide what was out of scope and vote to determine what deployment models we were looking at and why.

Rob Allen said that we should change the word between to “between/among” or “among” if we voted for this page. We don’t want the impression that it’s among labs and providers. Voted to have (s) added to “primary care provider(s)” instead.

A consensus vote on the abstract model resulted in a "yes" decision.

The Policy and Services Identification spreadsheet was updated. It is up for discussion today, not consensus vote. Cindy Levy will start through the idea of LRI implementation and some factors to be discussed next meeting.

Cell B5- added the word “content” between “message” and “must”. Added notes column and included the question “should there be services identified to validate an assembled messages conformance to appropriate regulations?”

It was agreed that we should start a discussion on particular point without taking position because we don’t have enough information. Policies for Validating Regulatory Conformance will be discussed next week.

Commit to reviewing and commenting on LRI policy and service identification sheet for discussion next week on where we will go on Architectural Overview. Email will be sent out regarding next week’s call.

Next Meeting

 * Date:** 06/02/2011
 * Time:** 2:00 PM-3:00 PM EDT
 * Dial in:**1-408-600-3600 **Passcode:** 667 213 308 (Meeting on 6/6)

Reference Materials

 * 1) Draft LRI __Deployment Models __ and __[|LRI Deployment Model Applicability]__
 * 2) __Draft Abstract Model__