ToC+Architecture+Impl+RQ+WG+Meeting+Minutes+2011-04-28

include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="TOC Header" =ToC Architecture Implementation RQ WG Meeting Minutes=
 * Date:** 04-28-2011
 * Time:** 2:00-3:00pm EDT
 * Dial-in:** 1-877-218-2835 | **Passcode:** 6174296#
 * Meeting Agenda: Click here for the agenda!**

Attendance
Tom Caruso, Myung Choi, Chris Doucette, Jaime Estrada, Ern Grove, Les Keepper, Cynthia Levy, Meredith Lewis, Arien Malec, Larry Sampson, Andriy Selivonenko, Mayuri Patel, Vassil Peytchev, Erik Pupo

Action Items

 * **#** || **Date Initiated** || **Action** || **Owner** || **Status** || **Date Closed** ||
 * 1 || 04-28-2011 || Review the updated ToC Abstract Model and post comments to the discussion page || All || In progress ||  ||
 * 2 || 04-28-2011 || Review the RI overview and post comments to the discussion page || All || In progress ||  ||

Agenda Items

 * 1) Review ToC Architecture Timeline & Short-Term Goals (Erik Pupo; Mayuri Patel)
 * 2) Review of Completed Activities (Erik Pupo)
 * 3) Presentation of the Abstract Model (Mayuri Patel; Cindy Levy)
 * 4) Presentation of RI Architecture (Mayuri Patel; Cindy Levy)
 * 5) Review of Deployment Model Illustrations (Erik Pupo; Tom Caruso)
 * 6) Next Steps (Erik Pupo)

Meeting Notes
Timeline & Short-Term Goals
 * Use Case has gone through the final consensus process
 * Feedback can be provided for future consideration to the UC team
 * Use Case is the driver for work; the expectation is that everyone's review of the scenarios is complete
 * Important to keep the timeline in mind when thinking through our goals
 * Review the timeline on the WG home page

ToC Abstract Model
 * Mayuri and Cindy Levy presented the Abstract Model to the group
 * Group provided several comments (listed below) that Mayuri and Cindy are working to incorporate
 * Comment 1: Projections of arrows are confusing - can someone clarify their meaning? - sending and receiving
 * Comment 2: Number 2: Remove the Reference Implementation (confusing)
 * Comment 3: Number 6: Package is created and sent; and the viewing is an extra step (unnecessary)
 * Comment 4: Combine some of the steps (4 steps in total; e.g. consumer system receives the package, deciphers and validates)
 * Comment 5: "Consultation Request Clinical Summary" - terminology from the UC; provider to specialist; means something different; what is the right term that we should use? - provider to provider (close loop referral); different scenarios
 * Comment 6: Make clear who the senders and receivers are with the other WGs

ToC RI Architecture Overview (Mayuri Patel)
 * Several layers; Data Element Services and Data Elements
 * Purpose of the Reference Implementation: Software representation of the CIM in terms of objects and attributes to reflect the domain entities and concepts

Next Meeting

 * Date:** 05-05-2011
 * Time:** 2:00-3:00pm EDT

include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="space.template.inc_contentleft_end"