LRI+Vocabulary+WG+Meeting+Minutes+7-7-2011

include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="LRI Header" =LRI Vocab WG Meeting Minutes=
 * Date: ** 07/07/2011
 * Time: ** 11:00AM – 12: 00PM EDT
 * Dial in:**  1-408-600-3600


 * Meeting Agenda:**
 * 1) Review changes made to Consensus Statement following the 7/5/11 call
 * Added Virginia's proposed statement to end of SNOMED section
 * Updated AP tests on In-Scope Tests list
 * Updated RACE tab in HL7 tables document to reference HL7 v2.5.1
 * 1) Review answers to questions from IG Analysis WG Leads on Universal Service tab
 * What is its primary Use Case? Why is it being created?
 * How will it be used?
 * Instead of using departments to write rules (which are very subjective from lab to lab), maybe use relationships?
 * Link parent/child (micro cultures/sensitivities)
 * Link parent with multiple levels of children (genomics)
 * 1) Review answer to questions from IG Analysis WG on Patient Class
 * Per confirmation from IG, will be determined by the Order Placer
 * 1) Review proposed changes to SNOMED CWE Data Types section (from Rob H)
 * 2) Begin review and reconciliation of workgroup members’ negatively balloted comments

Attendance
Tom Boal, Kathryn Calderone, Robert Coli, Rick Geimer, Freida Hall, Rob Hausam, Cindy Johns, Diana Massey, Riki Merrick, Bill Ormerod, Scott Robertson, Virginia Sturmfels, Merideth Vida, Bob Yencha

Action Items
Cindy Johns || In Progress ||  ||
 * **#** || **Date Initiated** || **Action** || **Owner** || **Status** || **Date Closed** ||
 * 1 || 07/07/2011 || Make modifications to your suggestions on the Consensus Voting Page || Bill Ormerod || In Progress ||  ||
 * 2 || 07/07/2011 || Make modifications to your suggestions on the Consensus Voting Page || Rob Hausam || In Progress ||  ||
 * 3 || 07/07/2011 || Move the UCUM and OIDs roadmap paragraphs to their respective sections. || Kathryn Calderone
 * 4 || 07/07/2011 || Follow up on the meaning of Multi-child/parent relationship || All Members || In Progress ||  ||
 * 5 || 07/07/2011 || Vote on Consensus Voting Page || All Members || In Progress ||  ||

Meeting Notes
All members need to vote on the LRI Consensus Voting Page.
 * Cindy Johns provided a brief update on what elements of the consensus page were updated.
 * During the LRI Leads Meeting, the Vocabulary group asked for clarification of the Universal Service Tab in addition to some other questions. Below are some of the key points discussed:
 * The goal of the IG group is to identify situations where you either “always have” or “never have” a parent/child relationship
 * You always have to have parent/child relationship for susceptibility/ the group is not sure on toxicology; what was proposed in the table still needs clarification
 * The group needs to follow up on the meaning of Multi-child relationship. For now the group agrees on the following definition: Parents with multiple levels of children- genomics is an example.
 * A suggestion from the group is to start with groups of tests, not departments; we need to think about groups of tests and where a parent/child relationship exists (toxicology, genomics, susceptibilities, cultures).
 * The Vocab WG still has several questions on the draft version 5 of the HL7 tables owned by the Vocab WG; the suggestion is to look conduct further research prior to reaching consensus.
 * <span style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; font-size: 13.3333px;">It was confirmed with the IG group that based on HL7, the order will be defined by the order placer, not the order filler.
 * <span style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; font-size: 13.3333px;">The Vocab group then took a look at the proposed changes made by Rob Hausam to the CWE Changes on OBX- 5 (See Consensus Voting Page)
 * <span style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; font-size: 13.3333px;">Remove “positive assertions” from end of first paragraph
 * <span style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; font-size: 13.3333px;">The SNOMED section of the Consensus page will be updated according to Rob’s changes (Cindy Johns will perform the action).
 * <span style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; font-size: 13.3333px;">Bill Ormerod- In Scope Test list
 * <span style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; font-size: 13.3333px;">Under UCUM, our proposal is to flesh out the use of UCUM in conjunction with a pilot; we should either recommend a vocabulary that is ready for use or not.
 * <span style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; font-size: 13.3333px;">We recommend UCUM as a vocabulary, but do not require it. A statement needs to be added reflecting this sentiment in the “Work group recommendations,” under Position and Strategy for Use of UCUM in the consensus statement.
 * <span style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; font-size: 13.3333px;">Scott Robertson: the pilot testing would discover gaps in UCUM and these would consequently be addressed.
 * <span style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; font-size: 13.3333px;">“Develop UCUM Roadmap” section to be moved to the Position and Strategy for use of UCUM section of the Consensus document.
 * <span style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; font-size: 13.3333px;">The group recommends moving the OIDs roadmap to the OIDs section of the consensus document as well for consistency.
 * <span style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; font-size: 13.3333px;">The group reviewed recommendations from Rob Hausam on the consensus voting page:
 * <span style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; font-size: 13.3333px;">Rob Hausam will make modifications based on the group’s suggestions; the updated text will then be copied back into the consensus statement.
 * <span style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; font-size: 13.3333px;">The group also discussed Bill Ormerod’s recommendations:
 * <span style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; font-size: 13.3333px;">The IG group recommends having a “Position and Strategy for Use of HL7 Tables” section in the consensus document.
 * <span style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; font-size: 13.3333px;">Bill will make comments and highlight changes on the consensus voting page relating to the different versions of the HL7 tables.

Next Meeting

 * Date:** 07/12/2011
 * Time:** 10:00-11:00 AM EDT
 * Dial in:**<span style="font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; font-size: 13.3333px;"> 1-408-600-3600

Reference Materials

 * 1) Consensus Statement
 * 2) LRI Vocabulary Consensus Page

include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="space.template.inc_contentleft_end"