LRI+Vocabulary+WG+Meeting+Minutes+8-23-2011

include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="LRI Header" =LRI Vocab WG Meeting Minutes=
 * Date: ** 08/23/2011 **| Time:** 10:00AM – 11: 00AM EDT
 * Dial In: ** 1-408-600-3600 **| Passcode: ** 660 071 157

Attendance
Hans Buitendijk, Kathryn Calderone, Clint Crowe, Joan DuHaime, Freida Hall, Rob Hausam, Hal Jiang, Cindy Johns, Cynthia Levy, Mike Long, Ken McCaslin, Bill Ormerod, Virginia Sturmfels, Merideth Vida, Bob Yencha

Action Items

 * **#** || **Date Initiated** || **Action** || **Owner** || **Status** || **Date Closed** ||
 * 1 || 8/23/2011 || Send IG Vocab list to Cindy Johns to review highlighted fields to verify that they are addressed || Kathryn Calderone || Completed || 8/23/2011 ||
 * 2 || 8/23/2011 || Send email to Vocab WG with the IG Vocab Variance Analysis document asking participants to identify table fields defined in external legislation. Send by COB 8/23 with a deadline to submit feedback by 8/29 COB || Kathryn Calderone || In Progress ||  ||
 * 3 || 8/23/2011 || Identify initial exceptions in the IG Vocab Variance Analysis document before soliciting community feedback || Cindy Johns and Hans Buitendijk || In Progress ||  ||

Agenda Item

 * 1) Review the “optional” tables to make sure there is nothing that needs to be addressed; Hans Buitendijk will provide clarification as needed
 * 2) Pilots/Validation Suite discussion
 * 3) Discuss Test data, Test scenarios, Testing (evaluate results)
 * 4) Type of Test data
 * 5) Selection of Core types of Lab Tests
 * 6) How 137 lab tests would be used to ensure full coverage
 * 7) Leverage existing test plans and test data

Meeting Notes

 * 1) ===IG Analysis WG - Optional Tables===
 * 2) [[file:siframework/Face to Face Table Ownership v2.0_JT.doc|IG Vocab Variance Analysis]]: everything in yellow highlights is required and conditional fields. Everything else is optional. The highlighted subset are partially IG analysis related and Vocab related. Two questions:
 * Is there anything in the vocab that is there that is not in a HL7 defined table?
 * Should we provide guidance for allowable values or leave to implementers?
 * **Choices:** no guidance provided or provide examples or define in the IG the specific values to be used
 * 1) The IG Analysis WG did not previously address religion, marital status, etc. because they are optional. All the yellow statements (required/conditional) have been addressed
 * 2) The highlighted fields have been voted on in the LRI Vocabulary consensus statement
 * 3) There are two approaches:
 * Refer to the base HL7 standard for optional fields and identify exceptions that may not have base standard guidance
 * Analyze every user defined table field that is optional to verify proposed vocabulary
 * **Voting on approaches**: There was a unanimous decision on approach 1.The WG will find the exceptions offline and bring to the next meeting Kathryn Calderone to send out the IG Vocab Variance Analysis list to the Vocab WG with a request asking people to identify table fields that are defined in external legislation
 * 1) ===Pilots/Validation Suite - Call for Participation===
 * 2) Pilots and Validation Suite is led by the Lockheed Martin team and they need to ensure that there is ample test data for pilots
 * 3) There have been 137 lab tests cases to be used for coverage
 * 4) The team would like to ask participants from LRI Vocab to assist them in defining additional test cases and creating test data to be used

Next Meeting

 * Date:** TBD pending community feedback on HL7 tables
 * Time:** TBD pending community feedback on HL7 tables

Reference Materials

 * 1) [[file:siframework/Face to Face Table Ownership v2.0_JT.doc|IG Vocab Variance Analysis]]
 * 2) LRI Vocabulary Consensus Page

include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="space.template.inc_contentleft_end"