PDMP+&+HIT+Integration+Initiative+Parking+Log

include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="MPM Header" include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="space.template.inc_sbsection_begin" =Quick Links= include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="space.template.inc_sbsection_end" include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="space.template.inc_sbsection_begin" =Meeting Schedule= media type="custom" key="24274934" include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="space.template.inc_sbsection_end"
 * Meeting Information
 * Join the Initiative
 * Project Charter
 * Use Cases
 * Past Meetings

include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="space.template.inc_sbsection_begin" =Feedback Welcome=
 * We value your input! **

Have a suggestion or idea for the initiative wiki? Send an email the Project Manager.

Need help using the Wiki? Send an email to Wiki Admin/Support. include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="space.template.inc_sbsection_end" include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="space.template.inc_sbrt_HowToGetInvolved_mpm"

=PDMP & HIT Integration Parking Lot Items= =include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="MPM Contacts"=
 * **Date** || **Parking Lot Item** ||
 * 1/14/2014 Use Case Discussions || * Discussing safety notifications, alerts and unsolicited reporting as an out of scope item
 * **Note to the community:** For this Use Case, the transactions that are initiated by the Health IT system and the query response are in scope. We will not be focusing on Unsolicited Reporting (PDMP pushing information out to a variety of end users) right now with this Use Case, but this may be considered at a later time. If alerts are part of the responses back to the Healthcare Professional, we can indicate a data element in the data requirements sections. We won't dictate what the alert looks like in the Use Case. (Community Addressed 1/21 All Hands) ||
 * 1/28/2014 Use Case Discussions || * Patient Identity Matching/Cross Referencing
 * **Note to the Community:** We have updated our assumption to read: "While it is understood that a query is sent by the HC Professional through the Health IT system to the PDMP, the PDMP returns a high number of positive matches back to the Health IT System; our Use Case assumes the HC professional or Health IT system positively identifies the POI." (Community Addressed 2/4 All Hands) ||
 * 2/25/2014 Use Case Discussions || * Adding additional PDMP system requirements as it deals with an intermediary
 * Adding Hub/HIE/Ph. Intermediary system requirements into Activity Diagram ||
 * 3/25/2014 Use Case Discussion || * We will be scheduling an additional community call to address the pick list mechanism/patient matching at a later date ||
 * 4/15/2014 Standards Evaluation Discussion || * In the case where a query is sent to both a PDMP and a medication history provider (e.g. SureScripts) with the expectation of assembling a medication history from both responses, how should "duplicate" controlled substances fills be reconciled?
 * **Note to Community:** Receiving system reconciles the information that comes in. Providers using EHR systems already have process for reconciling medication histories. ||
 * 02/09/2015 Pilot Discussion || * Costs
 * Resources
 * Business Agreements ||
 * 02/10/2015 Pilot Discussion || * Audit trail ||