LRI+IG+Analysis+WG+Meeting+2012-02-14

include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="LRI Header"

LRI IG Analysis Meeting Minutes
__ **Tuesday 02/14 3:00PM ET-5:00PM ET** __
 * WebEx: siframework2.webex.com **
 * Dial-In: 1-408-600-3600 **
 * WebEx Access Code: **** 660 860 390 **

**Meeting Agenda:**

 * = **ID** ||= **Key Discussion Items** ||= **Duration** ||= **Presenter** ||
 * = 1 ||= Review of Meeting Schedules Next Week ||= 5 Minutes ||= Hans Buitendijk ||
 * = 2 ||= Discussion on LRI Assumption Document ||= 10 Minutes ||= Freida Hall ||
 * = 3 ||= Ballot Reconciliation via the Project Management Wiki Page ||= 95 Minutes ||= Hans Buitendijk ||
 * 4 || Parent Child Linking Discussion: [|IG Parent Child Linking_2012_02_07-ajk.doc] || 10 Minutes || Austin Kreisler ||

Attendance
Hans Buitendijk, David Burgess, Ernest Grove, Freida Hall, Austin Kreisler, Natalie Menser, Riki Merrick, Brian Pech, Scott Robertson, Rob Snelick, Shalina Wadhwani

Action Items

 * **#** || **Action** || **Owner** || **Status** || **Due Date** ||
 * 1 || Merge Parent-Child Linking Documentation || David Burgess/Austin Kreisler || Open ||  ||
 * 2 || Forward LRI Assumption Document to Key Use Case Members For Review || Natalie Menser || Open ||  ||

Meeting Notes

 * Next Week’s Schedules **
 * Ernest Grove, Les Keeper, David Burgess, Riki Merrick (only Thursday), Hans Buitendijk, Scott Robertson will be available next week
 * Freida Hall, Ken McCaslin, Rob Snelick, Bob Yencha will not be available next week
 * Will hold the meetings as scheduled
 * Check if next week’s meetings can be an hour each, instead of two hours


 * LRI Assumption Document – Freida Hall **
 * Freida Hall has been participating in the Use Case Simplification workgroup
 * They try to come up with reusable components across use-cases (e.g. identifying patients)
 * Mapping data elements out of the TOC use case – Freida was doing the same for the LRI IG
 * Where there wasn’t a map, new sections/groupings were created
 * Is there anyone that will look through the document and validate it or document issues?
 * Natalie will forward this document to the key Use Case WG members to see if it appropriate
 * Natalie Menser will set up a call for the week of the 27th with the use case group and will get Gary Dickinson who chairs the Use Case Simplification


 * Parent-Child Linking Ballot Reconciliation **
 * David Burgess and Austin Kreisler mocked up a Parent/Child Linking document on how it is affected by the RU and RN Profile Components
 * It must be understood that an observation can be the catalyst for the addition tests (reflex tests for example). When looking at these, it is important to understand which observation was the originator (Parent), and which observation was generated (Child)
 * This linking is not just for microbiology, but also for reflex tests
 * Hans - If putting it in section 6 is more important than the introduction, how should they be blended together?
 * David – additional examples provide other the other three profile combinations would handle the same susceptibility reporting
 * Section 29 – how to link the Child OBR to the Parent OBR
 * Make an explicit assumption that the combination or order number and university service identifier is unique
 * OBR.29 V19
 * Delete comment “For this linkage to work properly, the Placer Order Number and the Filler Order Number must uniquely identify the specific parent OBR. This means the same Filler Number cannot be used to identify multiple OBRs.”
 * David Burgess moves, Austin Kreisler seconds; 0 against, 0 abstain, 8 for
 * OBR.50 V19
 * Change comment to “May need to change spreadsheet comment and re-open.”
 * Motion to accept as proposed, and adjudicate spreadsheet if found in contradiction
 * Austin Kreisler moves, David Burgess seconds; 0 against, 0 abstain, 8 for
 * For Child’s OBR the Specimen Action Code needs to be G in the examples
 * Also needs to insert a conformance statement in Section 1.5.6 (V19) under the LRI Common Profile Component that to adhere to this profile the Sender (proper actor name) shall be able to send Culture/Susceptibilities and Reflex test results, while the Receiver (proper actor name) must be able to receive, Culture/Susceptibilities and Reflex test results using the method described in chapter 6 (subject to the specific combination of profile components actually used)
 * Austin Kreisler moves, Rob Snelick seconds; 0 against, 1 abstain, 6 for
 * Want to merge the above documentation into Chapter 6 with existing materials. Current chapter is GU/RU. Need to “duplicate” current chapter 6 to GU/RN, NG/RU, NG,RN
 * Austin Kreisler and David Burgess will take a first cut at this. Will be looking for use of shall/conformance statements where we have field/segments/component/etc. conformance statements
 * Next week will look at new version 6.1 of the Parent/Child linking discussion


 * Date/Time **
 * MSH.7
 * TS-1
 * YYYY R
 * MM R
 * DD R
 * HH R
 * MM R
 * [.S[S[S[S]]] O
 * [+/-ZZZZ] O
 * PID.7
 * TS-0
 * YYYY R
 * MM RE
 * DD RE
 * HH RE
 * MM RE
 * [SS[.S[S[S[S]]] O
 * {+/-ZZZZ] O
 * OBR.7
 * TS-2
 * YYYY R
 * MM C(X/R)
 * DD C(X/R)
 * HH C(X/RE)
 * MM C(X/RE)
 * [SS[.S[S[S[S]]] C(X/O)
 * If YYYY = ‘0000’
 * {+/-ZZZZ] C(X/O)
 * If YYYY = ‘0000’
 * Conformance Guidance: Use of time zone offset is encouraged
 * OBR.8
 * TS-3
 * YYYY R
 * MM R
 * DD R
 * HH RE
 * MM RE
 * [SS[.S[S[S[S]]] O
 * {+/-ZZZZ] O
 * Conformance Guidance: Use of time zone offset is encouraged
 * OBR.22
 * TS-4
 * YYYY R
 * MM R
 * DD R
 * HH R
 * MM R
 * [SS[.S[S[S[S]]] O
 * {+/-ZZZZ] O
 * Conformance Guidance: Use of time zone offset is encouraged

include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="space.template.inc_contentleft_end"