6-2-11+Arch+meeting

=Architecture/Implementation Requirements WG Meeting Minutes=
 * Date:** 06/02/2011
 * Time:** 2:00 PM-3:00 PM EDT
 * Dial in:**1-408-600-3600 **Passcode:** 667 213 308
 * Meeting Agenda:** 06/02 Agenda

Attendance
Rob Allen, Nagesh (Dragon) Bashyam, Tom Boal, Amy Brantley, Kathryn Calderone, Joan DuHaime, Hal Jiang, Lester Keepper, Cynthia Levy, Bob Lutolf, John Ritter, Andriy Selivonenko, Rob Snelick, Jonathan Tadese, Serafina Versaggi, Steve Wagner, Bob Yencha

Action Items

 * **#** || **Date Initiated** || **Action** || **Owner** || **Status** || **Date Closed** ||
 * 1 || 05/23/2011 || Review and comment on LRI Policy and Service Identification sheet for discussion next meeting. || All || Open ||  ||
 * 2 || 05/23/2011 || Review and comment on draft abstract models. || All || Open ||  ||
 * 3 || 05/23/2011 || Formulate ideas on LRI Implementation and factors for discussion. || Cindy || Open ||  ||

Agenda Items
1. Review list of Policy Service Identification 2. Review Architecture Overview and Implications 3. Review Policies for Validating Regulatory Conformance.

Meeting Notes
Bob Lutolf- What should be in a reference implementation guide?

Cindy Levy- One of goals of a Reference Implementation is more or less open to how the Architecture team will be a value to community. Question is whether providing tools or reference implementation that will allow validation or anything along those lines would be valuable. It’s fairly wide open in terms of what would be of value.

Bob Lutolf - Problems of Electronic Lab Reporting. Some problems that were observed from conference meeting in California is…. looked at a number of labs in California. What kind of labs, hospital lab has largest number of test results. Independent labs do most of the work. If we come up with something to provide value to lab or generation side, we are talking about a small number of people that will benefit. In California LIS has 70% of market. When talking about value, there’s value to LIS. Labcorp and LIS are doing most of lab results. Smaller labs don’t have infrastructure to do electronic lab reporting. Lack of single standard..so hopefully from IG analysis we can get resolved.

Bob Lutolf- what can we to develop tools, and codes, because that’s really driven by regulation in a way, and paying people to do it. Maybe there is some front end code to generate IG group message. The input side seems to vary by LIS, it might vary in ELINCS, HITSP..HL7 etc. how do we bound it on the input side. Start point depends on what makes sense for that start point to be. That may be a solution an LIS needs to come up with.

Cindy Levy- States that she has been having discussions with Dragon and would like to get involved with Erik. Meredith was asked to set this up. She requested that Bob Lutolf to share the results from the California conference that he attended.

Cindy Levy- Reach out to Erik, Jitin, or Arien. If possible, contact Bob Lutolf and have a discussion to try to get one of them to join the call. At this point it is critical to get guidance to move forward. With guidance Bob Lutolf can move group forward. Cindy will try to be available with whatever time. The group agrees that there is no point in having meeting unless we have someone (Erik, Jitin, Arien) on Monday. Meredith will reach out and possibly set up a meeting to discuss with Erik Pupo.

The group concluded that we needed someone from high up in ONC to help Bob move the initiative forward. Without enough people attending we aren’t able to get much done. The meeting ended early after only half an hour.

Next Meeting

 * Date:** 06/06/2011
 * Time:** 2:00 PM-3:00 PM EDT
 * Dial in:**1-408-600-3600 **Passcode:** 666 372 808

Reference Materials
1. Draft LRI Deployment Models and [|LRI Deployment Model Applicability] 2. Draft Abstract Model