LDAP+X500+IHE+HPD+Workstream+Meeting+9-13-2011

**Provider Directories (PD) Initiative LDAP X.500/ IHE HPD Workstream Meeting**

 * Date:** 9-13-2011
 * Time:** 11:00 am - 12:00 pm
 * Dial In:**1-408-600-3600 | **Passcode:** 669 347 140

**Attendance:**
Naveen Amiruddin, Peter Bachman, Tynisha Carter, Robert Dieterle, Richard Eshbach, Ernest Grove, Hal Jiang, Lester Keepper, Vince Lewis, William Ryan, John Sanchez, Terri Skalabrin, Jonathan Tadese, Lin Wan, Karen Witting

**Action Items:**

 * **ID** || **Date** || **Description** || **Owner** ||
 * 1 || 9/13/2011 || Reassess Column C by cross referencing the Use Case to ensure that fields that Query also contain a Return. || Jonathan Tadese ||
 * 2 || 9/13/2011 || Read the Use Case 1 Consensus page and provide feedback to be reviewed for Consensus on Monday, 9/19. || All ||

Cross-Workgroup Agenda Items

 * **ID** || **Work Group Name** || **Meeting Time** || **Proposed Agenda Item** ||
 * 1 || Use Case 2 || Thursday, 9/15 || Continue the Prefix/Suffix discussion. ||
 * 2 || Use Case 2 || Thursday, 9/15 || Discuss coded values. ||
 * 3 || Use Case 2 || Thursday, 9/15 || Discuss the relationship of order and objects in the case of 'Most Likely' Addresses. ||
 * 4 || Use Case 2 || Thursday, 9/15 || Discuss the need for a status on Credentials. ||
 * 5 || Use Case 2 || Thursday, 9/15 || Review Distinguished Names. ||
 * 6 || PD Spring Team || Friday, 9/16 || If needed, discuss expanding the PD scope to include "Roles" ||

Meeting Minutes
The Workstream (WS) analyzed Karen Witting's Data Element mapping to the LDAP X.500 ISO HPD Standard Spreadsheet, which is populated based on the HPD standard. The Use Case 2 SWG is refining these data elements into objects.
 * Objective:** Continue mapping data elements to the LDAP X500 ISO HPD standards Spreadsheet. [|(Click Here to Edit)]
 * The spreadsheet utilizes the following **color scheme**: ** Green: ** Confirmed | **Yellow:** Outstanding
 * **Prefix and Suffix:**
 * Prefix: Both the 'Object Class' and 'Attribute with Class' are confirmed.
 * Suffix: Removed title and assigned a Generation Qualifier in the 'Attribute with Class' column.
 * //Agenda Item:// Continue the Prefix/Suffix discussion in the Thursday Use Case 2 SWG meeting.
 * **Provider Type:** Removed the hcProfession "description" for the Provider Type data element under each column.
 * **Specialty:**
 * Specialization, as defined by the WG, is a major group of specialization rather than a detailed approach. HPD dictates that Specialty is ISO 21298; ISO confirms that specialization is defined as major groups.
 * We are currently using coded values and there is a special format in HPD to code values. Requirements traceability is necessary in the instance that more than one data schema is allowed.
 * The WS should define the elements that a provider needs to carry but the format can be individually defined.
 * //Agenda Item:// Discuss coded values in the Thursday Use Case 2 SWG meeting.
 * **Gender:** Gender is male or female (M/F) although the WG is unsure if this is HPD or LDAP.
 * **Address:**
 * HPD contains three types of addresses - Billing, Mailing, and Practice.
 * The WS discussed the feasibility of an additional Office Address, but decided to preclude its use.
 * A Legal Address could be helpful and should be added.
 * The WS discussed Practice and Service locations
 * the Practice location is physician oriented
 * The Service location is organization oriented. An Organization may not always have a Practice location unless it is a physical organization.
 * Agreed to use the Practice Address for Service Location.
 * The case of 'Most Likely' Addresses for billing, mailing, and practice depends on the object hierarchy and order. Order, in LDAP, is particularly important.
 * //Agenda Item:// Discuss the relationship of order and objects in the case of 'Most Likely' Addresses in the Thursday Use Case 2 SWG meeting.
 * **Telephone Number:** There is no need to include a physician's personal phone number to identify an electronic address. The current data element componenets are sufficient.
 * **NPI:** The assigning authority for NPI is ISO 2191.
 * **Electronic Address:** Electronic Address is a string field that needs additional work. Progress made to this data element can be made into a recommendation for IHE adoption. Defer this topic to a later meeting, or until Bob Dieterle has reviewed the IHE work.
 * **Status:** Confirmed on existing content.
 * **Professional Degree:** Confirmed on existing content.
 * **Professional Degree Year:** Confirmed on existing content.
 * **Credentials:**Credentials consists of Professional Degree, Certifications, and State Licenses. There are several optional attributes for credentials including issue date, renewal date, status, and general description.
 * //Agenda Item:// Discuss the need for a status on Credentials with the Thursday Use Case 2 SWG.
 * **Organization Name**: This row was deleted because the organization's legal name and alias name are already captured elsewhere.
 * **Distinguished Names**: There is a requirement to have a distinguished name even without a certificate. ANSI is the governing body that verifies distinguished names.
 * //Agenda Item:// Review Distinguished Names with the Use Case 2 SWG on Thursday.

Next Steps

 * The Workstream will continue analysis of the Data Element mapping Spreadsheet.
 * The Use Case 1 Consensus page is available for comments. Consensus will start next Monday, 9/19.

Reference Materials

 * [|LDAP X.500_ISO_HPD Spreadsheet]
 * Use Case 1 Consensus Wiki Page