Certificate+Discovery+for+Direct+Project+2011-12-13


 * Certificate Discovery for Direct Project Call **
 * Date: **12/13/2011

Cynthia Levy, Arien Malec, peter bachman, Victor Palli, Virginia Riehl, Chuck Hagan, Robert Dieterle, Raja Kailar, Kevin Castellow, Zeshan Rajput, Ken Pool
 * Attendees:**
 * Agenda:**
 * Discuss comments raised during IG consensus voting process
 * Action Items:**
 * Action Item – Support staff will take a large part of section 2 and add it to a background appendix section.
 * Action Item – Support staff will go through the IG and address the shoulds/musts.
 * Action Item – Support staff will check the RFC cross references and validate/change them.
 * Action Item – support team will reach out to Greg Myer to clarify.


 * Meeting Minutes:**
 * Comment: Too much background/rationale in the guide.
 * Action Item – Support staff will take a large part of section 2 and add it to a background appendix section.
 * Comment: Too many “shoulds/musts” in the requirements language.
 * The narrative section uses “should”, which entails a level of optionality.
 * Action Item – Support staff will go through the IG and address the shoulds/musts.
 * Comment: Incorrect and incomplete RFC references.
 * Action Item – Support staff will check the RFC cross references and validate/change them.
 * Comment: make sure the specification written is unambiguously implementable.
 * Needs to go in both publishing and consumer sections?
 * Comment: should it be usercertificate or userSMIMEcertificate?
 * Action Item – support team will reach out to Greg Myer to clarify.
 * Next step will be to create a revision of the document addressing these comments.