LCC+-+Patient+Assessment+Summary+SWG+Meeting+Minutes+2012-05-23

include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="LCC Header"

**Meeting Agenda:**

 * **Topic** || **Time Allotted** ||
 * Geisinger MDS Patient Assessment Summary Project Update || 5 Minutes ||
 * Update on CARE TEP || 5 Minutes ||
 * SWG Comments on CCDA Ballot || 5 Minutes ||
 * Review OASIS PAS Rosetta Stone || 75 Minutes ||

Attendance
Brett Marquard, Cyndie Lundberg, Jennie Harvell, LeighAnn Campbell, Meredith Lewis, Sandy Stuart, Sarah Gaunt, Shalina Wadhwani, Sue Mitchell, Victor Palli, Zabrina Gonzaga

Action Items

 * **#** || **Action** || **Owner** || **Status** || **Due Date** ||
 * 1 || Provide feedback on the OASIS PAS Rosetta and send to Sue Mitchell || All Members || Open || 6/13 ||

Meeting Notes

 * Geisinger MDS Patient Assessment Summary Project Update **
 * The Gobbler is scheduled to be in product next Friday, June 1st
 * Anyone part of the patient’s care team is authorized to view the MDS
 * The key health exchange used is an opt-in model (patients must consent to share information at each facility); information can be shared once these forms have been collected


 * Update on CARE TEP **
 * The group hosted a virtual technical panel to update key stakeholders on the future of long-term post-acute care
 * Lantana is developing a TEP report that will be shared in the beginning of July, though the scope will not be limited to just CARE
 * The Project Scope Statement will be posted to the LCC PAS Wiki Page
 * The key question to ask in analyzing CARE is what data set is relevant to a provider of care; this should be followed with an analysis of the set of data that is clinically relevant in a transfer of care document
 * Victor and Brett should follow-up with Judy Tobin and Don Mon to get the rights to post the spreadsheet posted to the wiki


 * SWG Comments on CCDA Ballot **
 * Comments to the CCDA ballot are due June 4, though participants must register to vote by May 28th
 * Sue has posted slides to the LCC PAS wiki page that review how to provide comments on the ballot
 * It is best to have individual members comment so they don’t come through as one bloc vote; if there is anything who is not able to pay the registration fee, contact Brett Marquard for comment submission


 * OASIS PAS Rosetta Stone **
 * The homework assignment for PAS SWG participants was to provide feedback on items selected by the ONC LTPAC Affinity Group to be included in the OASIS PAS; this feedback is being captured on the Rosetta Stone worksheet labeled "OASIS Summary - Model of meaning," found in the "OASIS PAS Rosetta Stone" spreadsheet
 * During this SWG meeting, the leads are going through the Patient Tracking section of the PAS Rosetta Stone to track disagreement with Summary Items and track Affinity Group Comments
 * Review of OASIS items must be complete by June 13th
 * The leads will track CMS header requirements (for the OASIS instrument) to ensure there is no duplication with PAS item listings
 * From a SNOMED perspective, these items cannot be mapped (ex. recertification reassessment, resumption of care); when something is not mapped to SNOMED, the user sees a style sheet that shows the narrative text of items, although LOINC Codes are still available
 * For areas where there are no SNOMED codes, human readable content is sufficient
 * Because Lantana is 9 weeks away from balloting, they will make a decision on how LOINC codes will be incorporated, then follow-up with the LCC PAS SWG
 * The group will discuss OASIS Reasons for Assessment once Mary St. Pierre is on the line
 * SWG participants should continue to provide feedback by referencing the OASIS C-Form on the PAS SWG wiki page
 * All feedback should be emailed to Sue Mitchel by June 13th

include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="space.template.inc_contentleft_end"