LOI+Vocabulary+WG+Meeting+Minutes+2012-09-11

**Meeting Agenda:**
|| 5 Minutes || Cindy Johns || * HL70001 Administrative Sex
 * **ID** || **Key Discussion Items** || **Duration** || **Presenter** ||
 * 1 || Final LOI Lab Test ORder Code Recommendations Document Posted
 * 2 || Review of HL7 Tables Not Previously Reviewed
 * HL70201 Telecommunications Use Code
 * HL70189 Ethnic Group
 * HL70064 Financial Class
 * HL70487 Specimen Type (+SNOMED)
 * HL70163 Body Site
 * HL70063 Relationship
 * HL70098 Type of Agreement
 * HL70068 Guarantor Type
 * HL70287 Action Code
 * HL70912 Participation
 * HL70051 Diagnosis Code
 * HL70052 Diagnosis Type
 * HL70359 Diagnosis Priority
 * HL70291 Subtype of Referenced Data
 * HL70834 MIME || 55 Minutes || WG Leads ||

Attendance
Bill Ormerod, Bob Yencha, Cindy Johns, Elitsa Evans, Jonathan Tadese, Maribeth Gagnon, Pam Banning, Riki Merrick, Saunya Williams, Virginia Sturmfels

Action Items
//No action items at this time.//

Meeting Notes

 * LOI Lab Test Order Code Recommendations:**
 * There was one minor change made to the document that was requested by the eDOS WG
 * The changed one references to “ELINCS Usage” to “ELINCS Orders Usage”
 * The new document has been posted to “Works in Progress” on the LOI Vocab wiki page


 * Data Comparison Spreadsheet**
 * The Readme tab includes a color-coding key
 * The HL70005 Race table includes hierarchical codes from the CDC
 * The table can be referred to as HL70005 or CDC REC, both of which would be correct; the WG needs to decide what code system identifier should be used for Race
 * The five digit numeric codes do not match the CDC hierarchical codes, but the CDC REC document also contains the five digit codes
 * The WG agreed to use the same six values in ELINCS using the five digit codes already in all documents; CDC hierarchical codes serve as an additional subset of codes and can be rolled up to the five digit codes
 * The WG will include a vocabulary recommendations section in PID 10 for Race and PID 22 for Ethnicity
 * Financial Class is R in ELINCS because some other field relies on it; the vocab recommendation is the ELINCS recommendation but includes a “Not Applicable” value
 * Virginia Sturmfels and Cindy Johns will speak to their billing groups to determine how it should be defined
 * Freida Hall will provide more background on the NK1 segment; we don’t have to make a recommendation on O vs. RE for NK-1 segments (it will be handled by the larger group)
 * Next week the group will start with the User Contact Role HL70131 table and determine which values should be included