ToC+Architecture+Impl+RQ+WG+Meeting+Minutes+2011-10-20

include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="TOC Header"

ToC Architecture Implementation RQ WG Meeting Minutes

 * Date:** 10-20-2011
 * Time:** 2:00-3:00pm
 * Dial-in:**1-408-600-3600 | **Passcode**: 667 669 756

Attendance
Susan Campbell, Ernest Grove, Les Keepper, Cindy Levy, Meredith Lewis, Mayuri Patel, Steve Rushing

Action Items

 * **#** || **Date Initiated** || **Action** || **Owner** || **Status** || **Date Closed** ||
 * 1 || 10-20-2011 || Update the descriptions for the artifacts and the works in progress || Harm Team || Open ||  ||
 * 2 || 10-20-2011 || Segment out the artifacts and works in progress to clarify the intended audience || Harm Team || Open ||  ||
 * 3 || 10-20-2011 || Revised the Deployment Model page with respect to language, graphics and diagram || Harm Team || Open ||  ||

Agenda Items

 * 1) Welcome and Announcements (Meredith Lewis)
 * 2) Review Deployment Models (Mayuri Patel, Cindy Levy)
 * 3) Review Policy and Service Analysis (Mayuri Patel and Cindy Levy)
 * 4) Next Steps (Meredith Lewis)

Meeting Notes

 * General**
 * Dr. Fridsma has expressed the notion that WGs express their respective value through their reflective outputs
 * The WG will need to scan through the wiki pages and make sure the artifacts all have clear and coherent descriptions
 * A suggestion was raised that artifacts and works in progress relevant to RI be segmented out
 * The Abstract Model is an item that can be applicable to RI specific work as well as being used by the community to deploy other solutions
 * Mayuri Patel will post a comment on the Direct Profile wikipage on UML diagrams.
 * It was suggested that the term "Works in Progress" will need to be revised since the WG will cease to contribute to the work but the intent of the term is to highlight to the S&I Framework and stakeholders is that these documents are "living" and should be continuously revised and improved.
 * The term "Intended Audience" was suggested as a column header to clarify the stakeholders and parties that can best use the artifacts.
 * TOC and LRI have similar work group setups and will be the first initiatives to wrap up.
 * It was decided the Harmonization team will monitor the Architecture wikipage for any discussion tab comments or suggestions around the artifacts and work products.
 * The WG revised the language behind the deployment models to provide clarifications around table definitions as well as overall context.
 * For the Policy and Service Analysis page, this will continue to be a living document but the language will need to be revised.
 * It was decided the TOC Architecture WG will to cease to meet after today.


 * Next Steps**
 * Review any outstanding action items from F2F meeting
 * Review Cindy Levy's revisions to the deployment table

Reference Materials

 * 1) Policy and Service Analysis
 * 2) Deployment Models
 * 3) TOC Direct Profile (Used by Direct Project participants)
 * 4) TOC Modular Specification Profile (Used by Exchange participants)

include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="space.template.inc_contentleft_end"