PD+-+Certificate+Discovery+for+Direct+Project+Use+Case+Consensus+Page

== The voting period is now closed for the Certificate Discovery for Direct Project's LDAP and DNS Hybrid Group. Consensus was reached on September 26, 2011. ==

Please enter your comments/endorsement of the Proposed Harmonization Statement for Query for Digital Certificate Use Case for Direct Project in the table below. Please find your name below, and provide a yes or no vote. If your vote is no, please explain __**in detail**__ what your objections are and how you believe they can be resolved.

Please note, only committed WG members can participate in the consensus process.


 * **Organization** || **Name** || **Endorsement (Yes, Yes with Comments, No)** || **If No, what can be changed to make it yes?** ||
 * n/a - Independent || Dr. Michael Brody ||  ||   ||
 * 3M Health Information Systems || Ron Sawdey ||  ||   ||
 * ABILITY Network Inc || Brett Peterson || Yes ||  ||
 * ABILITY Network Inc || McLain Causey || Yes ||  ||
 * Accredited Standards Committee X12 || Margaret Weiker ||  ||   ||
 * Accredited Standards Committee X12 || Don Bechtel ||  ||   ||
 * Accredited Standards Committee X12 || Gail Kocher ||  ||   ||
 * Allscripts || Derrick Evans || No || The "Work to be performed" section seems out of place and sounds like it should be included in the work effort section, I believe if you are going to have this section it should be towards the end so that logically we have a direction described and then the effort it will take to go in that direction . There is no definition for the "Hybrid" approach, what is it? ||
 * Axolotl Corp. || Lin Wan || Yes ||  ||
 * Cal eConnect || Robert Dieterle || Yes ||  ||
 * Cequs Inc. || Peter Bachman || Yes ||  ||
 * CMS || Daniel Kalwa ||  ||   ||
 * Colorado Regional Health Information Organization || Terri Skalabrin || Yes, with comments || * RE: Suggest we add "DNS is currently implemented and providing Digital Certificate discovery for a number of Direct pilots at a limited scale." -- Change to remove “Suggest we add” and quotes
 * Remove: (Volunteers needed with Direct Project Experience to fill out this section) (RCD)
 * The implementation guide is still in draft form. I assume it is excluded from consensus. ||
 * Covisint || Peter Gilbert ||  ||   ||
 * Covisint || Peter Greaves ||  ||   ||
 * eClinicalWorks || Ananya Gupta ||  ||   ||
 * GE Healthcare || John Moehrke || Yes || I agree, given the clarifications on the call September 19th, that this consensus is requested only on the direction to create a forthcoming guidance document. ||
 * Georgia Tech || Steve Rushing ||  ||   ||
 * Health-ISP || John Williams ||  ||   ||
 * Health Market Science || Michael l. Nelson || No || I agree with all of Karen's comments. ||
 * Holon Solutions || Sandra Schafer || No || I agree with Karen' comments. largely, my concerns are with the clarity and structure of the document rather than intent. This does not read like a finished statement. I would put the recommentadtion first after a brief introduction about the reason for the statement. The work effort needed and work to be performed could be combined and includednext followewd by the reference implementation and risks. The strenghts and weaknesses of DSN and LDAP could be moved to the end as a reference and should be put in a 3 colum,3 row table. ||
 * Iatric Systems || Mary Moewe ||  ||   ||
 * IBM || Karen Witting || Yes || My major concern is that this page does not act like a page for consensus but more like a work in progress. Comments 2, 4, & 5 reflect this concern.
 * 1) Third bullet of Strenths & Weaknesses, add "of" as in "a significant number (of) DNS servers currently do not support the CERT record
 * 2) I recommend the second and third sections be deleted from this consensus page. Should contain only strenths/weaknesses, group recommendation and references. Remove all "Work to be performed" ... and why is there two sections on this?
 * 3) If you keep the 2nd/3rd sections: "The Direct Project reference implementations have the capability to support" - I don't know if this section is a statement of fact or a statement of consensus. And the next section talks about the hybrid model yet nothing in the prior text explains what it is.
 * 4) "work effort needed" does not belong in a consensus page. Please remove this to an open issues page. This page should focus on the recommended direction.
 * 5) Remove the "color" legend, makes this page seem like a work in progress not a consensus building vehicle.
 * 6) Agree with comments from Terri Skalabrin as well ||
 * IBM || Mary-Sara Jones ||  ||   ||
 * IBM || Nitin Jain ||  ||   ||
 * IBM || Deanna Nole ||  ||   ||
 * IFMC || Stan Rankins ||  ||   ||
 * Indiana Health Information Exchange || John B. Sanchez ||  ||   ||
 * Informatics Corporation of America (ICA) || Ryan Balsick ||  ||   ||
 * Informatics Corporation of America (ICA) || Tim Dunnington ||  ||   ||
 * Inpriva, Inc. || Don Jorgenson ||  ||   ||
 * Inpriva, Inc. || Patrick Pyette ||  ||   ||
 * Louisiana Health Care Quality Forum || Al Manint ||  ||   ||
 * Massachusetts eHealth Institute || Dawn Heisey-Grove ||  ||   ||
 * Massachusetts eHealth Institute || Kris Cyr ||  ||   ||
 * McKesson || Marian Reed || Yes ||  ||
 * MedAllies, Inc || Vincent Lewis || Yes ||  ||
 * Medicity || Eric Heflin ||  ||   ||
 * Medicity || Steve Tripp ||  ||   ||
 * MedPlus || Scott Chapin || Yes ||  ||
 * Military Health System || Steve Hufnagel ||  ||   ||
 * NaviNet || Laurance Stuntz ||  ||   ||
 * NEHEN || Daniel Kearney ||  ||   ||
 * NeHII || Joni Bass || Yes ||  ||
 * Newborn Coalition || Annamarie Saarinen ||  ||   ||
 * Newborn Coalition || Jim Bialick ||  ||   ||
 * NextGate || Les Marcum ||  ||   ||
 * OZ Systems || Ken Pool || Yes || Agree with "clean up" edits proposed. ||
 * Secure Exchange Solutions, NIEM || Boris Shur ||  ||   ||
 * Secure Exchange Solutions || Dan Kazzaz ||  ||   ||
 * Secure Exchange Solutions || Michelle Darnell ||  ||   ||
 * SHAPE HITECH, LLC || Lester H Keeper || Yes ||  ||
 * SHAPE HITECH, LLC || Ernest W. Grove || Yes ||  ||
 * Siemens Healthcare || David Tao || Yes w two clarifying comments || Suggest rewording the first sentence, which currently says " //Note: consensus is for direction stated in this document"// because it's not clear what comprises the "direction." I suggest saying "//Note: consensus is for the **Group Recommendation** as stated in the first section of this document"//

"Strength & Weakness of DNS/LDAP " should be reworded as "Strength & Weakness of DNS and of LDAP" otherwise the slash may imply that it is DNS/LDAP together and be misconstrued as the hybrid approach. ||
 * Siemens Healthcare || Dan Huber ||  ||   ||
 * Social Security Administration || Marty Prahl ||  ||   ||
 * Social Security Administration || Shanks Kande ||  ||   ||
 * SYSNET International, Inc. || Odysseas Pentakalos, Ph.D. ||  ||   ||
 * Techsant Technologies LLC || Sri Koka || Yes ||  ||
 * Tennessee Office of eHealth || Will Rice ||  ||   ||
 * Tennessee Primary Care Association (TPCA) || Mara Robertson ||  ||   ||
 * Tunitas Group || Bill Pankey ||  ||   ||
 * US Dept of Veterans Affairs || Galen Mulrooney ||  ||   ||
 * New York eHealth Collaborative || Nick VanDuyne ||  ||   ||