HeD+Implementation+Guide+Feedback

include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="HeD Header" This page will be used to capture feedback on the draft ****, beginning on October 5, 2012. At this time, the Health eDecisions harmonization team is request revisions and feedback on the structure and format of the Implementation Guide. To provide feedback, please add your name, organization, section or sub-section you are providing feedback on, and your comments. If you would like to respond to any of the comments provided, please do so using the discussion board, which is accessible through the navigation bar in the upper right hand corner of the page. After comments have been addressed in the Health eDecisions WG meeting, comment resolution will be track in the table below. **The first round of feedback on the Implementation Guide is due by** ** 8pm EST, Tuesday, October 9th ** **.**

Please note that in order to provide feedback on the Implementation Guide, you must be a registered member of the S&I Framework wiki. Please visit the "Join the Initiative" portion of the Health eDecisions wiki page in order to sign up. If you are experiencing a blank screen after selecting "Edit", please click the "Edit" button at the top-right-hand corner of your screen a second time. To edit via visual editor, please click on the down arrow to the right of the "Save" button, and select "Visual Editor".

Homework
Please complete the homework below on the draft Implementation Guide by ** 8pm EST, Tuesday, October 9th: **
 * 1) Review introduction material in Sections 1 and 2 and comment
 * 2) Contribute any additional references to Appendix A that you feel implementers will need to review and be aware of
 * 3) Answer each of the questions embedded into the IG offline (listed in the following section)
 * 4) Be prepared for discussion on Thursday, October 11th on Section 3 - Components

Community Feedback on Draft 1 of the Implementation Guide
As you provide comments, focus on answering the questions below. Please remember to indicate the section of the draft Implementation Guide you are providing feedback on.
 * Introduction: What key points do we want to get across to CDS vendors and implementers?
 * Section 2.4: Should we include a full summary of the Use Case or rely on implementers to read on their own?
 * Section 2.5.2: Are there any other actors specifically involved in the structuring and encoding of the CDS knowledge artifact?
 * Section 2.5.3: In terms of guide format, are there any specific conventions that are considered critical to the CDS vendor community?
 * Section 6: Should documentation of the HeD Harmonized Schema be completed in a separate document with the supporting models, or should it be included in the Implementation Guide? Should documentation of the HeD Harmonized Schema follow the HL7 Domain Analysis Model (DAM) general format or be further customized to support the clinical decision support (CDS) domain?
 * **Name** || **Organization** || **IG Section** || **Comments** || **Resolution of Comments** ||
 * V Huser || NIH CC ||  || schema documentation should be part of the IG ||   ||
 * VH ||  ||   || +actor: professional society: e.g. American cardiology association role: "comment/ or endorse" a computerized version of their PDF guideline. E.g. CPIC consortium endorses a pharmacogenomics guideline computable representation. ||   ||

include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="space.template.inc_contentleft_end"