Structured+Data+Capture+Use+Case+Harmonization+and+Standards+(Implementation)

include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="Structured Data Capture PageTabs" toc

=Announcements= The purpose of the Implementation phase is to define the set of Harmonized Specifications and documentation required to solve the challenge, create the necessary reference implementation using the specifications and plan for operational pilot testing if goals and objectives are still justified. Learn more about the S&I Framework Processes & Guidelines and S&I Initiative Overview, Phases and Outputs.

//**Upcoming Activities**//
 * Rolling Review of SOAP/SAML IG
 * Please visit the IG page to see latest and earlier versions of the IG document

=IHE SDC Profile= Please visit the IHE SDC Profile page = SDC Standard & Transaction Consensus Form = The purpose of the Standard Transaction consensus form is to enable community members to voice their comments in a structured manner. Our goal is to gain consensus on the solution plan and other transaction documents by the next All-Hands WG meeting on Thursday, September 5th, 2013. Please click the link below to be redirected to the consensus page.

Please click here to go to the SDC Standard Transaction Consensus Form =Structured Data Capture IG Development= If you are interested in providing comments to the IG, please click the link below to be redirected to the IG development page.

SDC IG Development Page =Standards & Harmonization Timeline= =Standards Sub-Workgroup= Standards Sub-Workgroup Link =//Phase 1: Evaluate Standards//= //Click here to see archived phase 1 timeline//
 * //All Phase 1 deliverables can be found on this wiki page below://**
 * Standards-UCR Crosswalk Working Documents
 * Technical Feasibility Analysis of UC Requirements
 * Standards Evaluation
 * Candidate Standards List and Solution Diagram

=Standards-UCR Crosswalk Working Documents= // The Standards-UCR Crosswalk is used to map selected standards from the Standards Evaluation Spreadsheet against Use Case requirements. UC requirements include Information Interchange, System Functions, and Data Requirements. The crosswalk is used to capture gaps in functionality, dependencies between standards and the gap mitigation plans to resolve how to extend or modify existing standards. // ||= 7/21/2013 || -**Final Update** Added OAuth to support RESTful implementation; final selection of Standards for Transport, Security and Authentication; Reviewed and identified gaps for Content and Structure Standards - RFD, XD*, IHE DEX, CDA R2; CDA Questionnaire Form and Response IG, and XHTML || =Technical Feasibility Analysis of UC Requirements= // The Technical Feasibility Analysis is a review of SDC requirements from the Use Case. The Analysis is utilized as a tool to assess technical feasibility of both System Function requirements and Information Interchange requirements. This document is also used to describe successful EHR system pre-conditions and post-conditions. // =Standards Evaluation=
 * **Document** || **Date Uploaded** || **Updated Content** ||
 * Most recent:
 * SDC UCR Crosswalk - Archive || All past versions || - All previous updates ||
 * **Document** || **Date Uploaded** || **Notes** ||
 * [[file:Technical Feasibility Requirements 20130605.xlsx]] ||= 6/7/2013 || -Requirements for inclusion in the Implementation Guide with initial analysis ||

Standards Evaluation Documents
// The Standards Evaluation Spreadsheet is a tool for objective evaluation of standards from the Candidate Standards List across a matrix of various benchmarks. Standards are evaluated and reviewed by the S&I community for “Maturity”, “Adoptability”, and “S&I Specific” criteria. The former two are based off of the HITSC NwHIN recommendations for standards evaluation. The standards with higher scores are carried into the UCR-Standards Crosswalk for evaluation against SDC requirements. //
 * **Document** || **Date Uploaded** || **Updated Content** ||
 * Most recent:[[file:SDC Standards Evaluation Template Final 7.10.13.xlsm]] ||= 7/10/2013 || -Corrected an error in Consent Directives rating
 * Final Update** ||
 * SDC Standards Evaluation Template - Archive || All past versions || - All previous updates ||

Maturity vs. Adoptability Graphs

 * **Document** || **Date Uploaded** ||
 * [[file:SDC Standards Evaluation - Maturity vs. Adoptability Graphs.xlsm]] ||= 6/25/2013 ||

=Candidate Standards List and Solution Diagram= // The Candidate Standards List is meant to serve as a launching point for Standards & Harmonization activities by capturing a list of standards to be carried into standards evaluation. // // The solution diagram is a visualization of how the types of standards can map to the transactions identified in the Use Case. //
 * **The updated Solution Diagram is posted below. Feedback is closed as of COB 5/14 - thank you for your input!**

|| DC Team || Complete || Click Here to View Candidate Standards List Feedback || media type="custom" key="23053780" width="90" height="90" || Community Members || Complete || || SDS Team || Complete || =Standards & Harmonization Contacts= include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="Structured Data Capture Contacts"   //<![CDATA[// //function toggleDiv(divid){// //if(document.getElementById(divid).style.display == 'none'){// //document.getElementById(divid).style.display = 'block';// //}else{// //document.getElementById(divid).style.display = 'none';// //}// //}// ]]> **Click here to expand the Standards Analysis Archive** Hello world  Loading...  // Upcoming Activities // · We will conduct couple working sessions next weeks to continue evaluating selected standards against requirements o Here are the details of the working sessions: § First Session: **Wednesday 2-3 pm EST** (**6/26**) § Second Session: TBD – Please respond to Doodle Poll [|here] to confirm availability by **COB Monday, June 24, 2013**   // The Standards-UCR Crosswalk is used to map selected standards from the Standards Evaluation Spreadsheet against Use Case requirements. UC requirements include Information Interchange, System Functions, and Data Requirements. The crosswalk is used to capture gaps in functionality, dependencies between standards and the gap mitigation plans to resolve how to extend or modify existing standards. //
 * = **Item Name** ||= **File and Description** ||= **Owner** ||= **Targeted Completion Date** ||
 * **Narrowed and Updated** Candidate Standards List || For all of the standards evaluated using the HITSC criteria, the file includes:
 * Name and link to definition
 * Brief description
 * Individual who recommended evaluating this standard
 * Contact information for the community member who requested the standard's evaluation
 * Candidate Standards List || [[file:Structured Data Capture Candidate Standards.xlsx]] || SDC Team || Complete:
 * Solution Diagram || [[file:SDC_Standardspertransaction_Final-updated.pptx]]
 * Candidate Standards Links and Descriptions || **Current version:**
 * Name || Role || Email ||
 * Vijay Shah || SDC Harmonization Support Lead || vshah@jbsinternational.com ||
 * Caryn Just || Standards Development Support Lead || caryn.k.just@accenturefederal.com ||
 * Hector Cintron || Standards & Harmonization Support || hector.cintron@accenture.com ||
 * Jennifer Sisto || Harmonization Support Lead || jennifer.t.sisto@accenturefederal.com ||
 * **Document** || **Date Uploaded** || **Updated Content** ||
 * || 6/21/2013 || -Added IHE Data Element Exchange to Content & Structure ||
 * || 6/19/2013 || -Added ISO 13606 to Content & Structure. Updated the Totals tab and the Pivot tables. ||
 * || 6/18/2013 || -Updated Pivot tables to reflect latest ratings ||
 * || 6/18/2013 || -Updated RFD evaluation ratings. ||
 * || 6/13/2013 || -Added XForms to Content & Structure. Vocabulary & Code Set values were normalized to compensate for across the board "NA" rating under Maturity of Tech Components Criteria. The Pivot tables within worksheets "C&S Totals-Desc" and "Final List" were refreshed and reformatted. ||
 * || 6/12/2013 || -Revisited Common Formats within the Maturity and S&I criteria. Revisited XLS/XLSX/XLSM within the S&I criteria. ||
 * || 6/11/2013 || -C-CDA, CDA-R2, CIMI, esMD, common formats and XADES standards were evaluated. A worksheet was generated with the name "C&S Totals - Desc" that highlights the top evaluated Content & Structure standards for each transaction (please see worksheet for additional details). An additional worksheet was created with the name "Final List" that highlights the top evaluated standards for Content & Structure, Transport & Security, Cross Category and Vocabulary & Code Set. ||
 * || 6/10/2013 || The following standards were re-evaluated for S&I specific categories: ISO/IEC 11179, ODM, SAML, XACML, HL7 IG Consent Directives R1, HPSCS, esMD, XADES, CDASH, SHARE, caDSR, FHIR, HL7 IG for CDA R2 Form Def Doc R1, Common Formats ||
 * || 6/7/2013 || - FHIM and CIMI standards were evaluated - ratings placed in notes section. The following standards were evaluated for S&I specific categories: ISO/IEC 11179, ODM, SAML, XACML, HL7 IG consent Directives R1, HPSCS, esMD, XADES, CDASH, SHARE, caDSR, FHIR, HL7 IG for CDA R2 Form Def Doc R1, Common Formats ||
 * || 6/6/2013 || -SHARE standard was evaluated. Fixed minor navigation issue. ||
 * || 6/6/2013 || -The standards ISO/IEC (19763-13), CAP 135, XUA, RPE, ISO 16262, XHTML, CDS Knowledge Sharing IG were evaluated. S&I Content & Structure XLS/XLSX/XLSM was also evaluated. ||
 * || 6/5/2013 || -XD* was evaluated for S&I Content & Structure, Adoptabiliy Transport & Security and S&I Transport & Security. ||
 * || 6/5/2013 || -Maturity Transport & Security as well as Adoptability Transport & Security standard ODM was evaluated. Maturity Cross Category as well as Adoptability Cross Category standards CDASH and SHARE were evaluated. S&I Content & Structure standards ICSR, CTS2, CDASH were evaluated. ||
 * || 6/4/2013 || -Transport & Security standards SOAP, REST, HTTPS, TLS and ATNA were evaluated. Cross Category standards XMI and MDMI were evaluated. ||
 * || 6/3/2013 || -CIMI standard was evaluated for Maturity, Adoptability and S&I "Cross Category" worksheets. FHIR standard was also evaluated for Maturity Cross Category worksheet. ||
 * || 6/3/2013 || -C-CDA and CDA R2 notes were added for Adoptability Content & Structure ||
 * || 5/31/2013 || -C-CDA and CDA R2 notes were added for Maturity Content & Structure, Adoptability Content & Structure and S&I Content & Structure categories. ||
 * || 5/31/2013 || -List of Evaluators for SDC Standards Evaluation process ||
 * || 5/30/2013 || -Consolidated notes and rating discrepancies for Adoptability criteria. CDS standard rating changed in Adoptability for Content & Structure. DIRECT standard rating changed in Adoptability for Cross Category. ||
 * || 5/30/2013 || -caDSR and XMI standards were evaluated. ISO-11179 standards were also evaluated for the Maturity for Content & Structure criteria. The scores were placed into the notes section and are to be resolved with the community since ISO-11179 was already evaluated with other scores. ||
 * || 5/29/2013 || -Replaced Javascript Standard with ISO-16262 Standard. Notes for CAP 135 were added. Thirteen standards were evaluated for Adoptability of Content & Structure. Six standards were evaluated for Adoptability of Transport & Security. Two standards were evaluated for Adoptability of Cross Category. One standard was Evaluated for S&I Content & Structure. Two standards were evaluated for S&I Transport & Security. One standard was evaluated for Maturity of Cross Category. Seven standards were evaluated for Maturity of Transport & Security. ||
 * || 5/29/2013 || -Added "XLS/XLSX/XLSM" to Content and Structure standards list. This new standard was also rated for the maturity criteria. ||
 * || 5/24/2013 || -Evaluated an additional five standards in the "Maturity Content & Structure" worksheet ||
 * || 5/23/2013 || -Evaluated seven standards in the "Maturity Content & Structure" worksheet ||