LCC+-+Patient+Assessment+Summary+SWG+Meeting+Minutes+2012-05-30

include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="LCC Header"

**Meeting Agenda:**

 * **ID** || **Key Discussion Items** || **Duration** || **Presenter** ||
 * || //** General **// ||  ||   ||
 * 1 || Geisinger MDS Patient Assessment Summary Project Update || 5 Minutes || Leigh Ann ||
 * || //** Ballot Workstream **// ||  ||   ||
 * 3 || SWG Questions/Comments on C-CDA Ballot || 20 Minutes || Brett/Gaye/Zabrina ||
 * || //** Design Workstream **// ||  ||   ||
 * 4 || Continue Review of OASIS PAS Rosetta Stone (posted to wiki, start at row 158) || 65 Minutes || Sue ||

Attendance
Sarah Gaunt, Brett Marquard, Cyndie Lundberg, Sandy Stuart, Debby Schaefer, Zabrina Gonzaga, LeighAnn Campbell, Sue Mitchell, Ann Clarke, Ed Larsen, Girija Govindaraju, Jennifer Sisto, Latoya Thomas, Meredith Lewis, Terry Miller, Shalina Wadhwani, Mary St. Pierre, Ed Larsen, Jennie Harvell

Action Items

 * **#** || **Action** || **Owner** || **Status** || **Due Date** ||

Meeting Notes

 * Geisinger MDS Patient Assessment Summary Project Update**
 * Receiving production data that is being translated into a summary document
 * Still working out authorization piece of the viewability of the summary document in the portal


 * SWG Questions/Comments on CCDA Ballot**
 * Individual ballot comments are due next Monday
 * Brett communicated a few notes for the WG participants to remember:
 * Be specific about the location of the comment (e.g. Section, CONF#)
 * Copy and paste wording from the IG in the Existing Wording column
 * Show proposed wording and in the Comments section indicate what should be improved
 * Indicate if you want to be present during the resolution of any or all of your comments in the last column


 * Review of OASIS PAS Rosetta Stone**
 * The review begins with row 158
 * The leads spoke to Mary St. Pierre on the Reason for Assessment; there is value in the Reason for Assessment elements being included, but they cannot be mapped.
 * From a modeling perspective, it can be a problem to include elements that cannot be mapped.
 * We will figure out what to do with the gaps in SNOMED at a later point
 * One option is to say we want the PASD is something we want incorporated into EHRs
 * The second option is it to recognize the limitations of encoding PASDs
 * Jennie believes finishing the OASIS analysis is a priority so they can conduct a comparison of patient assessment summary items included in OASIS, CARE, IRFPAI to come up with a core assessment summary content captured by different assessment tools; we should finish OASIS then map between MDS and OASIS to figure out what sections are missing
 * Once we assess the models of use in the sections isolated by the mappings, we can choose which of the three options we will apply
 * Our job is to complete the OASIS spreadsheet to determine, as requested by the INFINITY group, which items are included in the summary. Once we finish by June 13th, we can delve into other issues
 * The Infinity group doesn’t care if a diagnosis comes through on a 1022 form or a 1024 form; one concern of the group is the redundancy issues that result
 * Mary St. Pierre will do additional research on evaluating the M1020 through M1024 items to provide input on the Case Mix Diagnoses for next week

include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="space.template.inc_contentleft_end"