UseCaseWGNotes_2162012

include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="LCC Header"

**Meeting Agenda:**

 * Agenda**
 * = **ID** ||= **Key Discussion Items** ||= **Duration** ||= **Presenter** ||
 * = 1 ||= SWG Updates ||= 15 Minutes ||= SWG Leads ||
 * = 2 ||= Review Use Case Structure ||= 15 Minutes ||= Kris, Terry ||
 * = 3 ||= Review Homecare Use Case Integration ||= 15 Minutes ||= Kris ||
 * 4 ||= Use Case Next Steps ||= 10 Minutes ||= Kris ||

Attendance
Ed Larsen, Kris Cyr, Jennie Harvell, Meredith Lewis, Shalina Wadhwani, Sue Mitchell, Susan Campbell, Terry O'Malley, Charlotte Weaver

Updates

 * Calls cancelled for Monday due to absences of key players
 * Sue on Patient Assessment Working Group - Taking Rosetta Stone for Patient Assessment Summary and inserted new data elements, deciding if they need to be pulled forward into summary or not
 * Should be finished with this exercise after their next call
 * GE contractors are trying to craft PAS in MDS 3.0; questions related to this
 * Looping in Geisinger to make sure everything is in sync with their groups
 * Volunteers could take a stab at defining details for the MDS data elements - what do they need when they take a patient?
 * Use Sue's document as a draft of elements, have volunteers edit this draft of data elements based on what they used/need
 * Need to answer if the care data elements are efficient
 * Terry, Jennie, Sue - clarification of "homework" on data sheet - call at noon on Friday to discuss specifics
 * Captured overarching standards through which the data is channeled - functional status, CCD, CDA questionnaire assessment
 * Compared functional status in assessment instruments - set up columns for future CEDD information
 * Sue will represent care contents in a similar fashion - value sets might not be fully represented in this material though, need to clear this up with Don this week

**Use Case Structure Review**

 * Displayed Use Case Structure "Bus" - Used what Terry had come up with on the wiki and merged into a picture of how one would construct the user stories
 * Terry has helped scope down the core LTPAC data set - within the big bucket, four different levels of data element organization
 * Appear to be required for every LTPAC ACH Exchange that was apparent in the impac survey
 * Three types of transitions - why people go from one place to another, a subset of people who come back

include component="page" wikiName="siframework" page="space.template.inc_contentleft_end"