LOI+Vocabulary+WG+Meeting+Minutes+2012-11-06

**Meeting Agenda:**

 * Weekly Agenda **
 * **ID** || **Key Discussion Items** || **Duration** || **Presenter** ||
 * 1 || Additional Meeting Time to Complete Vocabulary Review || 5 Minutes || WG Leads ||
 * 2 || Constrained vs. Unconstrained Value Sets from LRI Pilots || 10 Minutes || Freida Hall ||
 * 3 || Review of HL7 Tables
 * HL7 0163 Body Site (need update from LOI IG on field usage)
 * HL70098 Type of Agreement
 * HL70068 Guarantor Type
 * HL70287 Action Code
 * Hl70912 Participation
 * HL70051 Diagnosis Code
 * HL70052 Diagnosis Type
 * HL70359 Diagnosis Priority
 * HL70361 Application
 * HL70362 Facility
 * HL70357 HL7 Error Code
 * HL70516 Severity
 * HL70291 Subtype of Referenced Data
 * HL70834 MIME || 45 Minutes || WG Leads ||

Attendance
Bill Ormerod, Bob Yencha, Cindy Johns, Freida Hall, Maribeth Gagnon, Pam Banning, Riki Merrick, Shalina Wadhwani, Virginia Sturmfels

Action Items

 * **#** || **Action** || **Owner** || **Status** || **Due Date** ||
 * 1 || Extend next week's meeting from 9:00 AM - 11:00 AM eastern || Shalina Wadhwani ||  ||   ||

Meeting Notes

 * Additional Meeting**
 * The WG needs to schedule an additional meeting to complete all of the work by Thanksgiving
 * One option is to extend the meeting times on the 13th or 20th and the second is to schedule a separate meeting either this week or next week
 * The WG agreed to meet from 9:00 – 11:00 AM next Tuesday


 * Constrained vs. Unconstrained Value Sets from LRI Pilots**
 * Relevant to a situation in which there might be tables with values that automatically trigger an action by the system
 * Should the tables be left unconstrained or should pilots just provide feedback during the comments period?
 * It was decided that because the WG is not entirely sure which values in the HL7 tables will trigger actions, we will leave the value sets unconstrained for the tables already approved by the WG. Pilots can review the value sets and comment on those they would like to have constrained (and what values should be included in the constrained set) once the guide is out for public comment
 * The WG may also get some comments from the balloting as well


 * Review of HL7 Tables**
 * Body Site HL70163
 * Still don't have an answer from the LOI IG Analysis WG as to the usage of SPM-8 (RE vs. O). So will make a recommendation in case the useage is RE.
 * If SPM.8 is RE, recommend SNOMED values as provided in PHINVADS Body Site value set
 * OID will be provided in IG
 * Riki Merrick moves, Pam Banning seconds; 0 against, 0 abstain, 7 in favor
 * Type of Agreement Code HL70098
 * A value for Workman’s Compensation is needed as there is a condition predicate in the LOI IG that is based on this value
 * Motion to support the ELINCS value set that includes a coded value for Workman's Comp (not in the original HL7 table)
 * Freida Hall moves, Riki Merrick seconds; 0 against, 0 abstain, 7 in favor
 * Guarantor Type HL70068
 * Motion to accept ELINCS values
 * Riki Merrick moves, Freida Hall seconds; 0 against, 0 abstain, 7 in favor
 * Action Code HL70287
 * Motion to use constrained values from ELINCS
 * Riki Merrick moves, Bill Ormerod seconds; 0 against, 2 abstain, 5 in favor