Consensus+vote+on+user+story+selection+criteria

Consensus Page for the User story Selection Criteria (http://wiki.siframework.org/file/view/SI%20PHReporting-UseCaseSelectionCriteria-09-28-11REV.doc) and its spreadsheet representation (http://wiki.siframework.org/file/view/S%26I_PHreporting_UseCaseSelectionCriteria.xlsx)
 * **Organization** || **Individual Name** || **Endorsement (Yes or No)** || **If No, what can be changed to make it Yes?** ||
 * CDC/OSELS/PHITPO || Foldy || No || CLean up document, discard old grid at bottom of Word document; consider conslolidating separate elements to make simpler; a scale of compliance with some of the criteria. Overall good concept ||
 * NGIT || Vinion || No || IMHO user story (business-centric) and use case (system-centric) aren't the same thing. It would be helpful to have both to help target efforts. I am also concerned about "initial case report" - it looks like one use case with different content and purposes (i.e., fits multiple user stories). Is the intent to limit this effort this far? Is MU stage 1 &/or 2 criteria being considered, especially as a starting point for harmonization? This could be particularly relevant as a selection criteria and could shorten the effort needed. Weighting of the criteria could be helpful. ||